![]() The free, ad-supported versions of both services are largely identical, though Inoreader allows up to 150 sources compared to Feedly’s 100. In my opinion, both are excellent choices and you’ll get a great RSS reader and news aggregation solution whichever service you pick. Inoreader came in a close second, and if you do a cursory internet search you’ll find plenty of debates over whether Inoreader or Feedly is the superior product. If you’re struggling to click with Feedly, our runner-up pick is just as worthy of your consideration. I’ll admit I needed to change some of the feed display options before I was fully on-board, but once I had my preferences locked in I haven’t looked back. However, some readers commented that they found it to be cumbersome to use and others said they disliked the layout options. ![]() (Feedly Pro and Team are entirely ad-free.)Įven with the ads, Feedly’s free version is difficult to top. It’s worth mentioning that the free version is ad-supported, but these are mostly unobtrusive and kept to a minimum. There’s also a “Team” version that gives users the ability to create “boards” the can be accessed and edited by multiple users, plus integration with apps like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and more. A Pro version is also available for about $9/month that adds even more customisation options, lets you follow an unlimited number of sources, and gives users more granular search and tracking options like alerts for specific keywords. Those of you who voted for Feedly cited its ease of use, customisable interface, and helpful collection tools as noteworthy, and that’s just for Feedly’s free version. Oh, and both the web and mobile versions have built-in dark themes. Since it’s an RSS reader, Feedly can even be used to track YouTube and podcast subscriptions, blogs, and even newsletters in some cases. Its chronological feed, flexible search and organisation tools, and cross-platform syncing are all excellent, and it helped me wean off Twitter for news - and just about everything else. The Best: Feedlyįeedly got the most comments and upvotes from readers, which isn’t surprising - it’s one of the few RSS readers with a modern design and active support behind it. And in addition to that, we thought we’d share a few of our favourite RSS readers should you decide you’d like to start using that option.Ĭheck out the list below. ![]() We pulled together a useful guide for you here. If you’ve been wondering how to best get your news going forward, don’t panic. It’s major news that has turned the way Aussies consume media on its head. The desktop app was pretty, but I didn't spend long with it.With Aussies waking up this morning to the news that Facebook would no longer be allowing media outlets to share content to the social media platform. I don't have any experience with other RSS readers, other than trying Feeder for a few minutes yesterday. For me they're both good, but I keep finding myself more drawn towards Inoreader, paired with Pocket for actually reading the articles. ![]() However I tend to articles to Pocket to read anyway. This is available on desktop so hopefully it will be added to the mobile app one day. One thing Inoreader doesn't have in the mobile app is being able to change the font and layout when reading an article. You can also subscribe to newsletters without an email address, which is really neat. Inoreader also has some nice little features like "send to device", which lets me send a push notification with the article to my Pixel phone. When I'm comparing the same feeds in both apps, Feedly often has a hard time fetching and displaying images alongside article titles in list view, where Inoreader is managing this ok for the same articles. Inoreader seems to have an easier time getting the content in. Swings and roundabouts really, I just find myself more drawn to Inoreader overall, although I can't deny that Feedly's UI is a lot friendlier. The UI is generally more friendly and helpful, with quick access to actions like "save later" and "mark as read". On the other hand, Feedly has a nice bottom navbar on the mobile app which Inoreader lacks. Feedly's UI is quite busy with trying to push you towards pro features, and in the desktop app has this extra nav bar on the left which takes up a lot of space. I think that's true, but when comparing the apps I often find myself drawn to Inoreader's cleaner and more functional approach to UI.įeedly kind of looks like a beautifully designed magazine, whereas Inoreader's approach is more straightforward and compact. A lot of people say Feedly looks prettier than Inoreader.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |